Deepseek R1 vs GPT o1-preview

2025-12-13

The AI landscape is evolving rapidly with the introduction of DeepSeek R1, a model emphasizing precision and cost-efficiency, and GPT o1-preview, OpenAI's versatile powerhouse. This comprehensive comparison explores their specifications, benchmarks, and real-world performance to help you decide which model aligns best with your development needs.

20251213194251.jpg

1. Technical Specifications Comparison

While both models support a massive 128K input context window, they diverge significantly in output capacity and processing speed.

Specification GPT o1-preview DeepSeek R1
Input Context 128K 128K
Max Output Tokens 65K 8K
Parameters Undisclosed 671B
Speed (Tokens/sec) 144 37.2
Knowledge Cutoff Oct 2023 Unspecified (Newer)
Key Takeaway: GPT o1-preview is superior for tasks requiring massive text generation (65K tokens) and speed. However, DeepSeek R1 is a strong contender for precision tasks where output length is less critical.

2. Performance Benchmarks

Combining official release notes and open benchmarks, here is how they stack up in specialized domains:

Category Benchmark GPT o1-preview DeepSeek R1
Math MATH-500 92 97.3
Reasoning GPQA 67 71.5
Coding Human Eval 96 96.3
Cybersecurity CTFs 43.0 -

3. Real-World Practical Tests

Benchmarks are useful, but real-world prompts reveal the true "personality" and reliability of an AI. We tested both models across five critical areas.

Test 1: Simple Logic (Attention to Detail)

Prompt: "How many letters 'r' are in the word strawbery?" (Intentional typo)

  • GPT o1-preview: Failed. (Claimed 3 instances, ignoring the typo).
  • DeepSeek R1: Success. Correctly identified 2 instances.
Test 2: Complex Logical Reasoning

Prompt: Analyzing a complex logic puzzle regarding Medieval Arab philosophers and translations.

  • GPT o1-preview: Predicted Option B (Incorrect).
  • DeepSeek R1: Predicted Option A (Correct).
Test 3: Math Problem Solving

Prompt: Calculate distinct values by inserting parentheses into 2⋅3⋅4⋅5+1.

  • GPT o1-preview: Failed. Reasoning error led to 7 distinct values.
  • DeepSeek R1: Success. Correctly identified 4 distinct values.
Test 4: Coding (Refactoring Django)

Prompt: Optimize a Django `form_valid` method.

GPT o1-preview (4/5)

Excellent database optimization but created unnecessary lists in memory.

DeepSeek R1 (4/5)

Efficient memory usage with `values_list`, but sacrificed some code clarity for beginners.

4. Pricing: The Cost Efficiency Gap

One of the most shocking differences lies in the cost structure. DeepSeek offers a significantly more affordable solution for high-volume tasks.

Price (Per 1k Tokens) GPT o1-preview DeepSeek R1
Input Price $0.01575 $0.00061
Output Price $0.06300 $0.00241

Final Verdict

🏆 When to choose GPT o1-preview

  • Creative Writing: Produces rich, detailed content and storytelling.
  • Web Development: More reliable for generating bug-free HTML/CSS layouts.
  • Cybersecurity: Better established performance in CTF challenges.

🏆 When to choose DeepSeek R1

  • Math & Logic: Outperforms GPT in complex reasoning and calculation tasks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Drastically cheaper, making it ideal for scaling applications.
  • Memory Efficiency: Generates highly optimized code for backend logic.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)


Q: Which AI model is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 or GPT o1?

Both are excellent. GPT o1-preview often produces cleaner code for beginners and better web frontend designs. DeepSeek R1 excels at backend logic and memory optimization.

Q: Is DeepSeek R1 free to use?

DeepSeek R1 is not free, but it is significantly cheaper than OpenAI's models. Its input cost is approximately 96% lower than GPT o1-preview.

Q: Why does DeepSeek R1 perform better in math?

Benchmarks show DeepSeek R1 scoring 97.3 on MATH-500 compared to GPT's 92. Its architecture appears more attuned to step-by-step logical verification, reducing hallucination in calculations.