Enterprise Plans
AI Application Development
AI Translator API
AI SEO/GEO Service
Web Scraping Service
Log in
Qwen 2 72B VS ChatGPT 4o
The landscape of Large Language Models (LLMs) is evolving rapidly. Today, we delve into a comprehensive comparison between two industry titans: ChatGPT 4o (Omni), the flagship multimodal model from OpenAI, and Qwen 2 72B Instruct, the sophisticated open-source powerhouse from Alibaba Cloud. This analysis covers technical specifications, benchmark performance, and real-world practical testing.
Technical Specifications & Hardware Logic
| Specification | ChatGPT 4o | Qwen 2 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128K Tokens | 128K Tokens |
| Knowledge Cutoff | October 2023 | 2023 (Month Unspecified) |
| Parameters | > 175B (Estimated) | 72B |
| Release Date | May 13, 2024 | June 7, 2024 |
While Qwen 2 matches the 128K context window—essential for processing long documents—ChatGPT 4o maintains an advantage in sheer scale. However, Qwen 2's architecture is highly optimized for efficiency, making it a formidable rival in the open-source community.
Performance Benchmarks
The following data represents a synthesis of official release notes and independent open benchmarks, as originally discussed in Benchmarks and specs.
| Benchmark Category | ChatGPT 4o | Qwen 2 72B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU (Undergrad Knowledge) | 88.7 | 82.3 |
| GPQA (Graduate Reasoning) | 53.6 | 42.4 |
| Human Eval (Coding) | 90.2 | 86.0 |
| GSM8K (School Math) | 90.5 | 91.1 |
Real-World Practical Tests
💡 Test 1: Nuance and Sarcastic Creativity
Prompt: Provide 10 sarcastic jokes about coding struggles.
Results:
- ChatGPT 4o: Excellent execution. It understood the structural pattern of the "dad/son" dynamic and delivered high-quality developer humor.
- Qwen 2: Surprising depth. While slightly more "avant-garde," the jokes were technically accurate and humorous (e.g., debugging Python logic).
🧩 Test 2: Logical Reasoning (The Sock Problem)
The Challenge: Calculating the minimum socks needed to guarantee a pair from a specific set in the dark.
Both models correctly identified the worst-case scenario (picking all non-target colors first):
Calculation: 21 (Blue) + 17 (Red) + 2 (Black) = 40 Socks
Verdict: Both scored 100%. GPT 4o was more verbose, while Qwen 2 was more direct.
👁️ Test 3: Vision and Image Reasoning
In "trick question" scenarios involving image analysis, ChatGPT 4o remains the leader. It possesses native multimodal capabilities that allow it to understand physical states (like a cup being upside down) better than most open-source competitors. Note: Qwen 2 72B Instruct is primarily a text model; vision tasks are usually handled by its sister model, Qwen-VL.
Cost Efficiency & API Pricing
For developers, the price-to-performance ratio is often the deciding factor. Based on AICC API rates:
| Model | Input (per 1k tokens) | Output (per 1k tokens) |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen 2 | $0.00117 | $0.00117 |
| ChatGPT 4o | $0.0065 | $0.0195 |
Analysis: ChatGPT 4o is significantly more expensive, particularly for output tokens. Qwen 2 offers a massive cost saving for high-volume text generation.
Summary of Comparison
ChatGPT 4o remains the gold standard for complex reasoning, native multimodal tasks (vision/voice), and speed. It is 1.5x faster and slightly more "intelligent" in graduate-level logic.
Qwen 2 72B is the premier open-source choice. It rivals GPT-4 class models in coding and mathematics while being significantly more affordable. It is ideal for researchers and enterprises looking for high-performance text processing without the "OpenAI tax."
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. Which model is better for coding?
ChatGPT 4o has a slight edge in complex system design, but Qwen 2 is remarkably close in HumanEval scores. For standard script generation, both are excellent.
2. Can Qwen 2 process images?
The standard Qwen 2 72B Instruct is a text-based model. For vision tasks, OpenAI's GPT-4o is natively multimodal and performs better out-of-the-box.
3. Why is there a price difference?
ChatGPT 4o is a proprietary "Model-as-a-Service," whereas Qwen 2 is an open-source model. Using Qwen 2 via an API is cheaper because the underlying infrastructure costs for 72B models are lower than for the massive GPT-4o architecture.
4. Is the context window the same for both?
Yes, both models support up to 128,000 tokens, making them suitable for analyzing long-form documents or large code repositories.